- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Challenger RB453 vs. Hesston 956 Auto Looping
Challenger RB453 vs. Hesston 956 Auto Looping
4 reasons to buy Challenger RB453:
Sizes
Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 41 kW and 52.2 kW | 21 % less or 11.2 kW |
Press size
Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 813 mm | 6 % less or 51 mm |
Bale minimum weight | 517.1 kg and 998 kg | 48 % less or 480.9 kg |
Baler
Tines number | 96 and 60 dual | 37 % more or 36 |
3 reasons to buy Hesston 956 Auto Looping:
Press size
Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1524 mm | 17 % more or 305 mm |
Bale width | 1562 mm and 1182 mm | 24 % more or 380 mm |
Compression chamber
Belts number | 8 Laced or infinite and 6 Laced, wedge clamp | 25 % more or 2 Laced |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Weight | 2594.5 kg and 3085 kg |
Dimensional length | 3768 mm and 3937 mm |
Overall width | 2604 mm and 2985 mm |
Headroom | 2616 mm and 2921 mm |
Packaging device
System type | Automatic, electrically driven and Automatic, hydraulically driven |
Twine coils volume | 8 and 8 |
Compression chamber
Belt width | 17.8 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
Overall width | 2 m and 2.3 m |
Tine to tine width | 1.5 m and 1.9 m |
Number of rods | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3768 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3937 mm |
2. Overall width | 2604 mm | 2. Overall width | 2985 mm |
3. Headroom | 2616 mm | 3. Headroom | 2921 mm |