- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Hesston 814 vs. Massey Ferguson 2746A Auto Looping
Hesston 814 vs. Massey Ferguson 2746A Auto Looping
3 reasons to buy Hesston 814:
Press size
| Bale width | 1524 mm and 1182 mm | 22 % more or 342 mm |
| Bale minimum weight | 272.2 kg and 745.7 kg | 63 % less or 473.5 kg |
Baler
| Number of rods | 44 dual and 4 | 91 % more or 40 dual |
5 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 2746A Auto Looping:
Sizes
| Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 48.5 kW and 52.2 kW | 7 % less or 3.7 kW |
Press size
| Bale minimum diameter | 813 mm and 1829 mm | 56 % less or 1016 mm |
| Bale maximum weight | 997.9 kg and 907.2 kg | 9 % more or 90.7 kg |
Compression chamber
| Belts number | 6 Laced, wedge clamp and 5-level, 25 forming, infinite set | 17 % more or 6 Laced, |
Baler
| Tines number | 96 and 4 | 96 % more or 92 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4400 mm and 3768 mm |
| Overall width | 2590 mm and 2604 mm |
| Headroom | 2440 mm and 2921 mm |
| Weight | 2170 kg and 2776 kg |
Packaging device
| System type | Electric, With Position Feedback and Automatic, electrically driven |
| Twine coils volume | 8 and 8 |
Compression chamber
| Belt width | 27.9 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
| Overall width | 1.8 m and 2 m |
| Tine to tine width | 1.5 m and 1.5 m |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4400 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3768 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 2604 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 2440 mm | 3. Headroom | 2921 mm |