- Home/
- Comparison/
- Combine Harvester/
- New Holland CR940 vs. Case IH Axial-Flow 2577
New Holland CR940 vs. Case IH Axial-Flow 2577
5 reasons to buy New Holland CR940:
Purifying system
Total purification area | 5.4 m2 and 5.1 m2 | 6 % more or 0.3 m2 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 749.5 l. and 681.4 l. | 9 % more or 68.1 l. |
Motor
Power | 220 kW and 197.6 kW | 10 % more or 22.4 kW |
Grain reception and processing
Grain tank volume | 8986 l. and 8105 l. | 10 % more or 881 l. |
Unloading rate | 105.7 l/sec and 84.6 l/sec | 20 % more or 21.1 l/sec |
2 reasons to buy Case IH Axial-Flow 2577:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 13607.8 kg and 15561.8 kg | 13 % less or 1954.0 kg |
Motor
Displacement | 8.3 l. and 7.5 l. | 10 % more or 0.8 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Threshing device
Rotor diameter | 431.8 mm and 762 mm |
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3950 mm and 3932 mm |
Between tyres width | 3300 mm and 3353 mm |
Wheelbase | 3760 mm and 3418 mm |
Operation
Transmission type | Hydrostatic drive, 4-speed gearbox and Hydro-Static Transmission |
Motor
Manufacturer | New Holland and Case IH |
Images
Sizes
2. Between tyres width | 3300 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 3353 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3932 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3760 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3418 mm |