- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT565B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 425
Challenger MT565B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 425
4 reasons to buy Challenger MT565B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 370 l. and 75 l. | 80 % more or 295 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 6479 kg and 2500 kg | 61 % more or 3979 kg |
Motor
Displacement | 6.6 l. and 3.8 l. | 42 % more or 2.8 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 180 l/min and 17 l/min | 91 % more or 163 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4842 mm and 3980 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 3118 mm and 2580 mm |
Wheelbase | 2890 mm and 2140 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 7302.8 kg and 2590 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Perkins |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and natural aspiration |
Model | C6.6 ACERT and A4.236 |
Power take mechanism power | 108.1 kW and 40.8 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 21000 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | automatic transmission system with power gear shifting and 8-speed with sliding spur gear |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4842 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3980 mm |
3. Height with rollover protection system | 3118 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2580 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2890 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2140 mm |