- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- John Deere 8130 180 Power Take Horsepower vs. McCormick CX95
John Deere 8130 180 Power Take Horsepower vs. McCormick CX95
7 reasons to buy John Deere 8130 180 Power Take Horsepower:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 681 l. and 155 l. | 77 % more or 526 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5625 kg and 3875 kg | 31 % more or 1750 kg |
Motor
Maximum torque | 913.8 Nm and 386 Nm | 58 % more or 527.8 Nm |
Full power | 167.8 kW and 67.1 kW | 60 % more or 100.7 kW |
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Displacement | 9 l. and 4.4 l. | 51 % more or 4.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 166.6 l/min and 60 l/min | 64 % more or 106.6 l/min |
3 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 4 | 83 % more or 20 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 3220 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 11.00-24 and 10.00-16 |
Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 480/80R46 and 16.9R34 |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and Turbocharger with wastegate |
Gear box
Transmission type | powershift transmission and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 3220 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |