- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 420 vs. McCormick CX75
Massey Ferguson MF 420 vs. McCormick CX75
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 420:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 42 l. and 34.5 l. | 18 % more or 7.5 l. |
Turn radius | 3250 mm and 4400 mm | 26 % less or 1150 mm |
8 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 48 l. | 69 % more or 107 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2040 kg and 1790 kg | 12 % more or 250 kg |
Motor
Maximum torque | 294 Nm and 270 Nm | 8 % more or 24 Nm |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.3 l. | 25 % more or 1.1 l. |
Full power | 54.4 kW and 48 kW | 12 % more or 6.4 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 52.6 l/min | 12 % more or 7.4 l/min |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3510 mm and 4209 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 2380 mm and 2540 mm |
Wheelbase | 2060 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 6.50-16 6PR and 7.50-16 |
Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 13.6R28 and 13.6R36 |
Working weight | 2275 kg and 3285 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
Transmission type | partial synchronizer and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
3. Height with rollover protection system | 2380 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2060 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 3510 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |