- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 465 vs. McCormick CX75
Massey Ferguson MF 465 vs. McCormick CX75
5 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 465:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 210 l. and 155 l. | 26 % more or 55 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3200 kg and 2040 kg | 36 % more or 1160 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 6 l. and 4.4 l. | 27 % more or 1.6 l. |
| Full power | 89.5 kW and 54.4 kW | 39 % more or 35.1 kW |
| Maximum torque | 442 Nm and 294 Nm | 33 % more or 148 Nm |
3 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 17 l/min | 72 % more or 43 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 4 | 83 % more or 20 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4560 mm and 4209 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2640 mm and 2540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2710 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3626 kg and 3285 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 9.00-16 and 7.50-16 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 18.4-34 and 13.6R36 |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | synchronizer and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4560 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2640 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2710 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |