- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TN75DA
McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TN75DA
6 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 74 l. | 52 % more or 81 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1800 kg | 54 % more or 2075 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.9 l. | 34 % more or 1.5 l. |
Full power | 76.1 kW and 55.9 kW | 27 % more or 20.2 kW |
Maximum torque | 415 Nm and 298 Nm | 28 % more or 117 Nm |
3 reasons to buy New Holland TN75DA:
Operation
Turn radius | 3628 mm and 4400 mm | 18 % less or 772 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 64 l/min and 60 l/min | 6 % more or 4 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2131 mm |
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3954 mm |
Operation
Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 10.00-16 and 9.5x15 |
Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9R34 and 14.9x28 |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging |
Gear box
Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and 8x8 full mesh transmission with synchronized mechanical drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3954 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2131 mm |