- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland TB100 vs. McCormick CX105
New Holland TB100 vs. McCormick CX105
2 reasons to buy New Holland TB100:
Motor
| Displacement | 5 l. and 4.4 l. | 12 % more or 0.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 67.4 l/min and 60 l/min | 11 % more or 7.4 l/min |
5 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 140 l. | 10 % more or 15 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1633 kg | 58 % more or 2242 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 76.1 kW and 73.1 kW | 4 % more or 3.0 kW |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 2 | 92 % more or 22 |
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2310 mm and 2237 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3730 mm and 4209 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2530 mm and 2540 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 2755 kg and 3285 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 18.4x30R1 tires and 10.00-16 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 18.4x30R1 tires and 16.9R34 |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharger with wastegate |
Gear box
| Transmission type | 8x2 full mesh and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3730 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2530 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2310 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |