- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT255 vs. Buhler Versatile 305
Challenger MT255 vs. Buhler Versatile 305
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT255:
Motor
Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 28 % more or 700 rev |
7 reasons to buy Buhler Versatile 305:
Operation
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5896.7 kg and 600.1 kg | 90 % more or 5296.6 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 22.7 l. | 98 % more or 923.7 l. |
Motor
Full power | 246.1 kW and 21.2 kW | 91 % more or 224.9 kW |
Displacement | 11 l. and 1.5 l. | 86 % more or 9.5 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 190 l/min and 37.5 l/min | 80 % more or 152.5 l/min |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Forward gears number | 12 and 9 | 25 % more or 3 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Tyre size | Front 25x8.50 - 14 Rear 12.5/80-18 and 520/85R42 |
Dimensional length | 2959.1 mm and 6750 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2014.7 mm and 3627 mm |
Wheelbase | 1639.8 mm and 3597 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 956.6 kg and 13834.6 kg |
Three-point attachment type | Cat. I and Category III/IVN |
Motor
Aspiration | natural aspiration and Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 14685.8 kPa and 19700 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | full mesh and Mechanical gearbox Quadshift 12x4 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 2959.1 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6750 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2014.7 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3627 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1639.8 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3597 mm |