vs.

      Challenger MT875B vs. McCormick CX95

      6 reasons to buy Challenger MT875B:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1254 l. and 155 l. 88 % more or 1099 l.

      Motor

      Torque increase 42 % and 33 % 21 % more or 9 %
      Displacement 18.1 l. and 4.4 l. 76 % more or 13.7 l.
      Cylinders number 6 and 4 33 % more or 2
      Full power 425 kW and 67.1 kW 84 % more or 357.9 kW

      Hydraulic system

      Pump bandwidth 164.7 l/min and 60 l/min 64 % more or 104.7 l/min

      4 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:

      Motor

      Power measured at 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Gear box

      Forward gears number 24 and 16 33 % more or 8
      Reverse gears number 24 and 4 83 % more or 20
      Maximum speed 40 km/h and 39.6 km/h 1 % more or 0.4 km/h

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Outer frame width 3601 mm and 2147 mm
      Dimensional length 6863 mm and 4209 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3509 mm and 2540 mm
      Wheelbase 2997 mm and 2356 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 19141.6 kg and 3770 kg

      Motor

      Aspiration Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and Turbocharger with wastegate

      Gear box

      Transmission type powershift transmission and Powershift / power drive

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 6863 mm 1. Dimensional length 4209 mm
      2. Outer frame width 3601 mm 2. Outer frame width 2147 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3509 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2540 mm
      4. Wheelbase 2997 mm 4. Wheelbase 2356 mm