- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CN50 vs. Challenger MT315B
McCormick CN50 vs. Challenger MT315B
4 reasons to buy McCormick CN50:
Motor
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2150 rev / min | 17 % more or 450 rev |
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Reverse gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
6 reasons to buy Challenger MT315B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 109.7 l. and 51 l. | 54 % more or 58.7 l. |
Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 45 amperes | 44 % more or 35 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 43.3 kW and 35 kW | 19 % more or 8.3 kW |
Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.5 l. | 24 % more or 0.8 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 59.8 l/min and 34.4 l/min | 42 % more or 25.4 l/min |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 29.9 km/h and 27.7 km/h | 7 % more or 2.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Outer frame width | 1303 mm and 1930 mm |
Dimensional length | 3193 mm and 1480 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm and 1050 mm |
Wheelbase | 1900 mm and 827 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 2360 kg and 3000.1 kg |
Three-point attachment type | 1 and Cat. I/II |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 32.8 kW and 33.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3193 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 1480 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 1303 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1930 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 827 mm |