- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CT47 vs. Challenger MT275
McCormick CT47 vs. Challenger MT275
7 reasons to buy McCormick CT47:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 38 l. and 29.9 l. | 21 % more or 8.1 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1250 kg and 952.5 kg | 24 % more or 297.5 kg |
Motor
Full power | 35 kW and 29.9 kW | 15 % more or 5.1 kW |
Displacement | 2.5 l. and 1.5 l. | 40 % more or 1.0 l. |
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
Reverse gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT275:
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 46.2 l/min and 31 l/min | 33 % more or 15.2 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 2415 mm and 2368.3 mm |
Wheelbase | 1758 mm and 1740.4 mm |
Dimensional length | 3192 mm and 3009.9 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 1625 kg and 1331.3 kg |
Three-point attachment type | 1 and Cat. I |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 30.6 kW and 24.2 kW |
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2600 rev / min |
Gear box
Transmission type | Synchronized and Synchronized mechanical drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3192 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3009.9 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2415 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2368.3 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1758 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1740.4 mm |