- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX85 vs. Daedong EX50 HST
McCormick CX85 vs. Daedong EX50 HST
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX85:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 45 l. | 71 % more or 110 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2957 kg and 1131 kg | 62 % more or 1826 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 62.6 kW and 37.3 kW | 40 % more or 25.3 kW |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.4 l. | 45 % more or 2.0 l. |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 3 ranges | 87 % more or 21 |
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 30.7 km/h | 23 % more or 9.3 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Daedong EX50 HST:
Operation
| Turn radius | 3130 mm and 4480 mm | 30 % less or 1350 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 63.9 l/min and 60 l/min | 6 % more or 3.9 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3455 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2445 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 1880 mm |
| Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and Front 9.5-16 Rear 13.6-26 |
| Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 1646 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3770 kg and 1785 kg |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and hydrostatic |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3455 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1646 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2445 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1880 mm |