- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland T5040 vs. McCormick CT28
New Holland T5040 vs. McCormick CT28
7 reasons to buy New Holland T5040:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 127 l. and 32 l. | 75 % more or 95 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2605 kg and 1188 kg | 54 % more or 1417 kg |
| Generator current strength | 120 amperes and 50 amperes | 58 % more or 70 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 63.4 kW and 20.9 kW | 67 % more or 42.5 kW |
| Displacement | 4.5 l. and 1.5 l. | 67 % more or 3.0 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 79.5 l/min and 30 l/min | 62 % more or 49.5 l/min |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 30 km/h and 26.1 km/h | 13 % more or 3.9 km/h |
2 reasons to buy McCormick CT28:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2558 mm and 4050 mm | 37 % less or 1492 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2300 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4120 mm and 2987 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2560 mm and 2314 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2350 mm and 1660 mm |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. II and 1 |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 52.2 kW and 17.2 kW |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 12 |
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 12 |
| Transmission type | 12x12 mechanically driven and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4120 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2987 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2560 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2314 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2350 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1660 mm |