- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 815F vs. Dynapac CT260
Caterpillar 815F vs. Dynapac CT260
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 815F:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 446 l. and 400 l. | 10 % more or 46 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 179 kW and 156.6 kW | 13 % more or 22.4 kW |
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Sizes
Clearance | 430 mm and 390 mm | 9 % more or 40 mm |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Reverse gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Maximum speed | 22.4 km/h and 17.9 km/h | 20 % more or 4.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
Front wheels roller width | 991 mm and 1 mm |
Front wheels roller diameter | 1029 mm and 1.5 mm |
Rear wheels roller width | 991 mm and 1 mm |
Rear wheels roller diameter | 1029 mm and 1.5 mm |
Sizes
Width between wheels | 3243 mm and 853 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3347 mm and 3518 mm |
Wheelbase | 3350 mm and 3250 mm |
Length with blade on ground level | 6845 mm and 3.6 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 20755 kg and 21400 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | 3176C ATAAC and 6CT8.3 |
Blades
Width | 3652 mm and 853 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 6845 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm |
2. Width between wheels | 3243 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 853 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3347 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3350 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm |
5. Clearance | 390 mm | 5. Clearance | 430 mm |