- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 836K vs. Dynapac CT260
Caterpillar 836K vs. Dynapac CT260
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Sizes
Clearance | 630.9 mm and 430 mm | 32 % more or 200.9 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 791.2 l. and 400 l. | 49 % more or 391.2 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 369.9 kW and 156.6 kW | 58 % more or 213.3 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm and 3.6 mm |
Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm and 853 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm and 3518 mm |
Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm and 3250 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 55936.6 kg and 21400 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C18 Acert and 6CT8.3 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
Reverse gears number | 4 and 4 |
Transmission type | planetary powershift transmission - ECPC and twin disc |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm |
2. Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 853 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm |
5. Clearance | 630.9 mm | 5. Clearance | 430 mm |