- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 836K vs. John Deere 646
Caterpillar 836K vs. John Deere 646
9 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Operation
Transmission fluid volume | 121.1 l. and 36.9 l. | 70 % more or 84.2 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 791.2 l. and 189.3 l. | 76 % more or 601.9 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 238.5 l. and 66.2 l. | 72 % more or 172.3 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 106 l. and 34.1 l. | 68 % more or 71.9 l. |
Motor
Full power | 419.1 kW and 105.1 kW | 75 % more or 314.0 kW |
Effective power | 369.9 kW and 97.7 kW | 74 % more or 272.2 kW |
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 6.6 l. | 64 % more or 11.5 l. |
Maximum torque | 3084.5 Nm and 471.8 Nm | 85 % more or 2612.7 Nm |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm and 6300 mm |
Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm and 2650 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm and 3130 mm |
Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm and 3640 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 55936.6 kg and 13613.2 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Gear box
Transmission type | planetary powershift transmission - ECPC and powershift |
Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 6300 mm |
2. Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 2650 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3130 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3640 mm |