- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Dynapac CT260
Ingersoll Rand SD122F vs. Dynapac CT260
1 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD122F:
Sizes
Clearance | 483 mm and 430 mm | 11 % more or 53 mm |
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 257 l. | 36 % more or 143 l. |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 22.4 km/h and 12.7 km/h | 43 % more or 9.7 km/h |
Forward gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
Front wheels roller width | 2134 mm and 1 mm |
Front wheels roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1.5 mm |
Sizes
Length with blade on ground level | 5895 mm and 3.6 mm |
Width between wheels | 2286 mm and 853 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3518 mm |
Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 3250 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Working weight | 12805 kg and 21400 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB5.9-30T and 6CT8.3 |
Gear box
Transmission type | hydrostatic and twin disc |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 5895 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm |
2. Width between wheels | 2286 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 853 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm |
5. Clearance | 483 mm | 5. Clearance | 430 mm |