- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Komatsu WF450-3 vs. Caterpillar 836K
Komatsu WF450-3 vs. Caterpillar 836K
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Sizes
Clearance | 630.9 mm and 475 mm | 25 % more or 155.9 mm |
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 106 l. and 68 l. | 36 % more or 38 l. |
Transmission fluid volume | 121.1 l. and 60 l. | 50 % more or 61.1 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 791.2 l. and 340 l. | 57 % more or 451.2 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 238.5 l. and 160 l. | 33 % more or 78.5 l. |
Motor
Full power | 419.1 kW and 194 kW | 54 % more or 225.1 kW |
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 11 l. | 39 % more or 7.1 l. |
Maximum torque | 3084.5 Nm and 1050 Nm | 66 % more or 2034.5 Nm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with blade on ground level | 8825 mm and 10183.4 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3735 mm and 4654.3 mm |
Wheelbase | 3400 mm and 4550.7 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 26000 kg and 55936.6 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | SA6D125E-2 and C18 Acert |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 4 and 4 |
Transmission type | powershift transmission and planetary powershift transmission - ECPC |
Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 8825 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3735 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3400 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm |
5. Clearance | 475 mm | 5. Clearance | 630.9 mm |