- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Caterpillar 973C vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Caterpillar 973C vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 430 l. and 427.8 l. | 1 % more or 2.2 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 43 l. and 41.6 l. | 3 % more or 1.4 l. |
Each final drive fluid volume | 28.5 l. and 28.4 l. | 0 % more or 0.1 l. |
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 88.3 kPa and 92 kPa | 4 % less or 3.7 kPa |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 2.8 m3 | 40 % more or 1.9 m3 |
Motor
Effective power | 178.2 kW and 178 kW | 0 % more or 0.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 9 km/h |
Working weight | 26373 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Engine oil volume | 29 l. and 29 l. |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Caterpillar |
Model | C9ACERT and C9 |
Carrier
Track width | 2080 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Track shoe width | 500 mm and 500 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2930 mm and 2930 mm |
Contact with ground area | 2.9 m2 and 2.9 m2 |
Images
Carrier
9. Track width | 2080 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |