- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D31Q-16 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D31Q-16 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
1 reasons to buy Komatsu D31Q-16:
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 30.4 kPa and 92 kPa | 67 % less or 61.6 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 115 l. | 73 % more or 312.8 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 41.6 l. and 22 l. | 47 % more or 19.6 l. |
| Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 6.5 km/h | 28 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Motor
| Effective power | 178.2 kW and 47 kW | 74 % more or 131.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 7053.4 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | 4D105-3 and C9 |
Carrier
| Track width | 1650 mm and 2082.8 mm |
| Track shoe width | 600 mm and 500 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1880 mm and 2930 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 9. Track width | 1650 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |