- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tracked Tractor/
- New Holland D95 WT vs. John Deere 850C
New Holland D95 WT vs. John Deere 850C
1 reasons to buy New Holland D95 WT:
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
8 reasons to buy John Deere 850C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 348.3 l. and 189.3 l. | 46 % more or 159.0 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 128.7 l. and 18.9 l. | 85 % more or 109.8 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 79.5 l. and 75.7 l. | 5 % more or 3.8 l. |
Final drive fluid volume | 15.1 l. and 14.2 l. | 6 % more or 0.9 l. |
Motor
Maximum torque | 783.7 Nm and 441 Nm | 44 % more or 342.7 Nm |
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 6.7 l. | 12 % more or 0.9 l. |
Torque measured at | 1300 rev / min and 1200 rev / min | 8 % more or 100 rev |
Effective power | 134.2 kW and 71.6 kW | 47 % more or 62.6 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Width between caterpillar tracks | 2820 mm and 3252.2 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 9163 kg and 18163.2 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | natural aspiration and turbocharging |
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Manufacturer | New Holland and John Deere |
Model | 667T/M2 and 400 lot |
Gear box
Transmission type | Hydro-Static Transmission and Hydro-Static Transmission |
Images
Sizes
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2820 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3252.2 mm |