- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Hitachi ZX270-3 vs. Volvo EC160BLC
Hitachi ZX270-3 vs. Volvo EC160BLC
8 reasons to buy Hitachi ZX270-3:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 12.6 rev / min and 11.9 rev / min | 6 % more or 0.7 rev |
Operation
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 11.7 l. and 2.6 l. | 78 % more or 9.1 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 500 l. and 260 l. | 48 % more or 240 l. |
| Generator current strength | 88 amperes and 80 amperes | 9 % more or 8 amperes |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 26 l. and 22 l. | 15 % more or 4 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 290 l. and 245 l. | 16 % more or 45 l. |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 676 Nm and 542.3 Nm | 20 % more or 133.7 Nm |
| Effective power | 140 kW and 81.3 kW | 42 % more or 58.7 kW |
6 reasons to buy Volvo EC160BLC:
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 23 l. | 8 % more or 2 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 145 l/min and 236 l/min | 39 % less or 91 l/min |
Motor
| Displacement | 5.7 l. and 5.2 l. | 9 % more or 0.5 l. |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 46.9 kPa and 55 kPa | 15 % less or 8.1 kPa |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.6 km/h and 5.5 km/h | 2 % more or 0.1 km/h |
| Hook traction force | 145 kN and 246 kN | 41 % less or 101 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 12383.1 kg and 165000 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Volvo |
| Model | AH-4HK1X and D6D EBE2 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 600 mm |
| Support rollers number on either side | 2 and 2 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 7 and 7 |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |