vs.

      Hitachi ZX650LC-3 vs. John Deere 890

      11 reasons to buy Hitachi ZX650LC-3:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 9.5 rev / min and 6 rev / min 37 % more or 3.5 rev

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3950 mm and 3600 mm 9 % more or 350 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 680 l. and 348.2 l. 49 % more or 331.8 l.
      Engine oil volume 57 l. and 34 l. 40 % more or 23 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 10.5 l. and 8.8 l. 16 % more or 1.7 l.
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34300 kPa and 18615 kPa 46 % more or 15685 kPa
      Fuel Capacity 900 l. and 484.5 l. 46 % more or 415.5 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 345 kW and 186 kW 46 % more or 159 kW
      Displacement 15.7 l. and 10.1 l. 36 % more or 5.6 l.
      Torque measured at 1500 rev / min and 1400 rev / min 7 % more or 100 rev
      Maximum torque 1980 Nm and 1098 Nm 45 % more or 882 Nm

      3 reasons to buy John Deere 890:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 912 l/min 77 % less or 704 l/min
      Cooling system fluid volume 72 l. and 57 l. 21 % more or 15 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 65900 kg and 42040 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Isuzu and John Deere
      Model AH-6WG1XYSA-02 and 500 lot
      Aspiration turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator)

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 4960 mm and 3700 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 12260 mm and 12100 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3950 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 13200 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12100 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 4460 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3700 mm