- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Hitachi ZX650LC-3 vs. John Deere 890
Hitachi ZX650LC-3 vs. John Deere 890
11 reasons to buy Hitachi ZX650LC-3:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 9.5 rev / min and 6 rev / min | 37 % more or 3.5 rev |
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3950 mm and 3600 mm | 9 % more or 350 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 680 l. and 348.2 l. | 49 % more or 331.8 l. |
Engine oil volume | 57 l. and 34 l. | 40 % more or 23 l. |
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 10.5 l. and 8.8 l. | 16 % more or 1.7 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34300 kPa and 18615 kPa | 46 % more or 15685 kPa |
Fuel Capacity | 900 l. and 484.5 l. | 46 % more or 415.5 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 345 kW and 186 kW | 46 % more or 159 kW |
Displacement | 15.7 l. and 10.1 l. | 36 % more or 5.6 l. |
Torque measured at | 1500 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 7 % more or 100 rev |
Maximum torque | 1980 Nm and 1098 Nm | 45 % more or 882 Nm |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 890:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 208 l/min and 912 l/min | 77 % less or 704 l/min |
Cooling system fluid volume | 72 l. and 57 l. | 21 % more or 15 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 65900 kg and 42040 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Isuzu and John Deere |
Model | AH-6WG1XYSA-02 and 500 lot |
Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 4960 mm and 3700 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 12260 mm and 12100 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3950 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 13200 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 4460 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm |