- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 790 vs. Hitachi EX130H-5
John Deere 790 vs. Hitachi EX130H-5
9 reasons to buy John Deere 790:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm and 2490 mm | 20 % more or 610 mm |
Operation
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 3.2 l. | 73 % more or 8.8 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 310 l. and 250 l. | 19 % more or 60 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 40 l. and 18.4 l. | 54 % more or 21.6 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 134 l. | 55 % more or 166 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 16.2 l. | 30 % more or 6.8 l. |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 698 Nm and 314 Nm | 55 % more or 384 Nm |
| Effective power | 116 kW and 60.4 kW | 48 % more or 55.6 kW |
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 4.3 l. | 43 % more or 3.3 l. |
2 reasons to buy Hitachi EX130H-5:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 25994 kPa | 24 % more or 8341.9 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 190 l/min and 480 l/min | 60 % less or 290 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 21972 kg and 12201.6 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Isuzu |
| Model | e 400 lot and A-4BG1T |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm and 2720 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm and 7580 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7580 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2720 mm |