vs.

      John Deere 792 vs. Komatsu PC240LC-7SLF

      8 reasons to buy John Deere 792:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm and 3180 mm 0 % more or 10 mm

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 45 l. and 30.9 l. 31 % more or 14.1 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 400 l. and 143 l. 64 % more or 257 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 12 l. and 6.6 l. 45 % more or 5.4 l.
      Fuel Capacity 450 l. and 400 l. 11 % more or 50 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 260 l/min and 440 l/min 41 % less or 180 l/min

      Motor

      Effective power 134 kW and 125.3 kW 6 % more or 8.7 kW
      Displacement 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. 22 % more or 1.7 l.

      3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC240LC-7SLF:

      Operation

      Engine oil volume 24 l. and 23 l. 4 % more or 1 l.
      Generator current strength 60 amperes and 42 amperes 30 % more or 18 amperes
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 37265.2 kPa and 25995 kPa 30 % more or 11270.2 kPa

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 27342 kg and 27119 kg
      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Aspiration Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator)
      Cylinders number 6 and 6
      Manufacturer John Deere and Komatsu
      Model 400 lot and SAA6D102E-2
      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm and 3230 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm and 14400 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3180 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 14400 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3230 mm