- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 890A vs. Kobelco 235SR LC High and Wide
John Deere 890A vs. Kobelco 235SR LC High and Wide
6 reasons to buy John Deere 890A:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm and 3450 mm | 4 % more or 150 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 484.5 l. and 291.5 l. | 40 % more or 193.0 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 348.2 l. and 230.9 l. | 34 % more or 117.3 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 189 l/min and 400 l/min | 53 % less or 211 l/min |
Motor
Effective power | 579 kW and 106.6 kW | 82 % more or 472.4 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
2 reasons to buy Kobelco 235SR LC High and Wide:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 11 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min | 50 % more or 5.5 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 20000 kPa | 42 % more or 14335.9 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 38555 kg and 27505.8 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Mitsubishi |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Model | 500 lot and 6D34-TE1 |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm and 3160 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm and 8890 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3450 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8890 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3160 mm |