vs.

      Komatsu PC240NLC-7 vs. John Deere 790

      6 reasons to buy Komatsu PC240NLC-7:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 400 l. and 310 l. 22 % more or 90 l.
      Engine oil volume 24 l. and 23 l. 4 % more or 1 l.
      Generator current strength 60 amperes and 42 amperes 30 % more or 18 amperes
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 37265.2 kPa and 25994 kPa 30 % more or 11271.2 kPa
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 440 l/min and 480 l/min 8 % less or 40 l/min

      Motor

      Effective power 126.8 kW and 116 kW 9 % more or 10.8 kW

      5 reasons to buy John Deere 790:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3100 mm and 2980 mm 4 % more or 120 mm

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 40 l. and 30.9 l. 23 % more or 9.1 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 300 l. and 143 l. 52 % more or 157 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 12 l. and 6.6 l. 45 % more or 5.4 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. 22 % more or 1.7 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 23380 kg and 21972 kg
      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Aspiration Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator)
      Manufacturer Komatsu and John Deere
      Model SAA6D102E-2 and e 400 lot

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3220 mm and 3000 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 9865 mm and 10000 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 2980 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3100 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 9960 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10000 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3295 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3000 mm