- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- New Holland E135SR vs. Volvo EC180BLC
New Holland E135SR vs. Volvo EC180BLC
3 reasons to buy New Holland E135SR:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 236 l/min and 290 l/min | 19 % less or 54 l/min |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 8830 mm and 8480 mm | 4 % more or 350 mm |
Maximum loading height | 6200 mm and 6140 mm | 1 % more or 60 mm |
5 reasons to buy Volvo EC180BLC:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2800 mm and 2490 mm | 11 % more or 310 mm |
Clearance | 460 mm and 455 mm | 1 % more or 5 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34300 kPa and 33000 kPa | 4 % more or 1300 kPa |
Motor
Full power | 90.2 kW and 63 kW | 30 % more or 27.2 kW |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 5710 mm and 5500 mm | 4 % more or 210 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 1425 mm and 2450 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3035 mm and 3370 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 14700 kg and 181000 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Isuzu and Volvo |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 500 mm and 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer length | 7470 mm and 8780 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2800 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3035 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3370 mm |
5. Clearance | 455 mm | 5. Clearance | 460 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1425 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2450 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 7470 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8520 mm |
11. Maximum radius along ground level | 8830 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 9180 mm |
13. Maximum excavation depth | 5500 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 6410 mm |
10. Maximum loading height | 6200 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 7550 mm |