vs.

      Volvo ECR235CL vs. New Holland E135SR

      7 reasons to buy Volvo ECR235CL:

      Sizes

      Clearance 460 mm and 455 mm 1 % more or 5 mm
      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3090 mm and 2490 mm 19 % more or 600 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34335.9 kPa and 33000 kPa 4 % more or 1335.9 kPa

      Motor

      Full power 123 kW and 63 kW 49 % more or 60 kW

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 6350 mm and 5500 mm 13 % more or 850 mm
      Maximum radius along ground level 9340 mm and 8830 mm 5 % more or 510 mm
      Maximum loading height 7570 mm and 6200 mm 18 % more or 1370 mm

      1 reasons to buy New Holland E135SR:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 236 l/min and 401.3 l/min 41 % less or 165.3 l/min

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 1680 mm and 1425 mm
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 3660 mm and 3035 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 25432.9 kg and 14700 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Volvo and Isuzu

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 600 mm and 500 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer length 9080 mm and 7470 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3090 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 2490 mm
      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 3660 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 3035 mm
      5. Clearance 460 mm 5. Clearance 455 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 1680 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 1425 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 600 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 500 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      11. Maximum radius along ground level 9340 mm 11. Maximum radius along ground level 8830 mm
      13. Maximum excavation depth 6350 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 5500 mm
      1. Unit load-transfer length 8985 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 7470 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 7880 mm 10. Maximum loading height 6200 mm