- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Komatsu PC35R-8 vs. Bobcat 320
Komatsu PC35R-8 vs. Bobcat 320
6 reasons to buy Komatsu PC35R-8:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1520 mm and 980 mm | 36 % more or 540 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 25000 kPa and 17200 kPa | 31 % more or 7800 kPa |
Motor
Full power | 24.6 kW and 11.7 kW | 52 % more or 12.9 kW |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 3150 mm and 2197 mm | 30 % more or 953 mm |
Maximum radius along ground level | 5125 mm and 3817 mm | 26 % more or 1308 mm |
Maximum loading height | 3750 mm and 2485 mm | 34 % more or 1265 mm |
1 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 30 l/min and 100.5 l/min | 70 % less or 70.5 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1610 mm and 1114 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1415 mm and 1068 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3575 kg and 1580 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Kubota |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 300 mm and 230 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum cut height | 5180 mm and 1574 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1520 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 980 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1610 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1114 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1415 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1068 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 300 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 230 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
13. Maximum excavation depth | 3150 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2197 mm |
9. Maximum cut height | 5410 mm | 9. Maximum cut height | 1574 mm |
10. Maximum loading height | 4020 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 2485 mm |
11. Maximum radius along ground level | 5505 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 3817 mm |