vs.

      Komatsu PC35R-8 vs. Bobcat 320

      6 reasons to buy Komatsu PC35R-8:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 1520 mm and 980 mm 36 % more or 540 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 25000 kPa and 17200 kPa 31 % more or 7800 kPa

      Motor

      Full power 24.6 kW and 11.7 kW 52 % more or 12.9 kW

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 3150 mm and 2197 mm 30 % more or 953 mm
      Maximum radius along ground level 5125 mm and 3817 mm 26 % more or 1308 mm
      Maximum loading height 3750 mm and 2485 mm 34 % more or 1265 mm

      1 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 30 l/min and 100.5 l/min 70 % less or 70.5 l/min

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Caterpillar track length on ground level 1610 mm and 1114 mm
      Rear platform swing radius 1415 mm and 1068 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 3575 kg and 1580 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Komatsu and Kubota

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 300 mm and 230 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum cut height 5180 mm and 1574 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 1520 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 980 mm
      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1610 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1114 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 1415 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 1068 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 300 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 230 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      13. Maximum excavation depth 3150 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 2197 mm
      9. Maximum cut height 5410 mm 9. Maximum cut height 1574 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 4020 mm 10. Maximum loading height 2485 mm
      11. Maximum radius along ground level 5505 mm 11. Maximum radius along ground level 3817 mm