- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Pel-Job EB30.4 vs. New Holland E25SR
Pel-Job EB30.4 vs. New Holland E25SR
5 reasons to buy Pel-Job EB30.4:
Sizes
| Clearance | 303 mm and 128 mm | 58 % more or 175 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 23000 kPa and 22600 kPa | 2 % more or 400 kPa |
Motor
| Full power | 20.4 kW and 13.2 kW | 35 % more or 7.2 kW |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 4606 mm and 4310 mm | 6 % more or 296 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 3210 mm and 3080 mm | 4 % more or 130 mm |
3 reasons to buy New Holland E25SR:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1500 mm and 1420 mm | 5 % more or 80 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 48 l/min and 50 l/min | 4 % less or 2 l/min |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 2810 mm and 2700 mm | 4 % more or 110 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1278 mm and 1500 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1304 mm and 750 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 2990 kg and 2650 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Yanmar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 300 mm and 250 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 4626 mm and 4130 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1420 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1500 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1278 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1500 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 303 mm | 5. Clearance | 128 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1304 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 750 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 300 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 250 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 4606 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 4310 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2700 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2810 mm |
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4629 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 4130 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 3389 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3080 mm |