- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Bobcat T320 vs. Caterpillar 279C
Bobcat T320 vs. Caterpillar 279C
6 reasons to buy Bobcat T320:
Sizes
Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm and 594 mm | 36 % more or 332.6 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 98.4 l. and 98 l. | 0 % more or 0.4 l. |
Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 8.1 km/h | 24 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 68.6 kW and 62.6 kW | 9 % more or 6.0 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump flow rate | 80.3 l/min and 84 l/min | 4 % less or 3.7 l/min |
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 26.9 kPa and 27.6 kPa | 3 % less or 0.7 kPa |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 279C:
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 14 l. and 13.6 l. | 3 % more or 0.4 l. |
Load-transfer device
Tipping load | 2940.6 kg and 4176.7 kg | 30 % less or 1236.1 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length without bucket | 2907.8 mm and 2960 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2054.4 mm and 2117 mm |
Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981.2 mm and 1981 mm |
Length with bucket | 3630.2 mm and 3679 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 4400.8 kg and 4486.9 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
Workload | 2088.3 kg and 1451.5 kg |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1618.5 mm and 1767 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with bucket | 3630.2 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3679 mm |
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981.2 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2054.4 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2117 mm |
6. Length without bucket | 2907.8 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 2960 mm |
8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 926.6 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 594 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1618.5 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1767 mm |