vs.

      Bobcat T320 vs. Caterpillar 279C

      6 reasons to buy Bobcat T320:

      Sizes

      Radius at maximum lifting and unloading 926.6 mm and 594 mm 36 % more or 332.6 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 98.4 l. and 98 l. 0 % more or 0.4 l.
      Maximum speed at low range 10.6 km/h and 8.1 km/h 24 % more or 2.5 km/h

      Motor

      Full power 68.6 kW and 62.6 kW 9 % more or 6.0 kW

      Hydraulic system

      Pump flow rate 80.3 l/min and 84 l/min 4 % less or 3.7 l/min

      Carrier

      Specific ground pressure 26.9 kPa and 27.6 kPa 3 % less or 0.7 kPa

      2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 279C:

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 14 l. and 13.6 l. 3 % more or 0.4 l.

      Load-transfer device

      Tipping load 2940.6 kg and 4176.7 kg 30 % less or 1236.1 kg

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Length without bucket 2907.8 mm and 2960 mm
      Height to cab upper part 2054.4 mm and 2117 mm
      Width between caterpillar tracks 1981.2 mm and 1981 mm
      Length with bucket 3630.2 mm and 3679 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 4400.8 kg and 4486.9 kg

      Motor

      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Load-transfer device

      Workload 2088.3 kg and 1451.5 kg

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track length on ground level 1618.5 mm and 1767 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Length with bucket 3630.2 mm 1. Length with bucket 3679 mm
      2. Width between caterpillar tracks 1981.2 mm 2. Width between caterpillar tracks 1981 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 2054.4 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2117 mm
      6. Length without bucket 2907.8 mm 6. Length without bucket 2960 mm
      8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading 926.6 mm 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading 594 mm

      Carrier

      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1618.5 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1767 mm