- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Case 420CT vs. Bobcat T650
Case 420CT vs. Bobcat T650
4 reasons to buy Case 420CT:
Operation
Cooling system fluid volume | 17 l. and 11.4 l. | 33 % more or 5.6 l. |
Load-transfer device
Tipping load | 2268 kg and 3330.7 kg | 32 % less or 1062.7 kg |
Hydraulic system
Pump flow rate | 73.8 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 15 % less or 13.3 l/min |
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 35.8 kPa and 40 kPa | 10 % less or 4.2 kPa |
3 reasons to buy Bobcat T650:
Sizes
Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm and 630 mm | 27 % more or 238.7 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 103.3 l. and 83.3 l. | 19 % more or 20.0 l. |
Motor
Full power | 55.4 kW and 44 kW | 21 % more or 11.4 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Width between caterpillar tracks | 1651 mm and 1853.2 mm |
Length with bucket | 3130 mm and 3474.7 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 1920 mm and 2066.5 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3334 kg and 4281.9 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
Workload | 1134 kg and 1664.7 kg |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1436 mm and 1499.6 mm |
Caterpillar track width | 320 mm and 320 mm |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with bucket | 3130 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3474.7 mm |
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1651 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1853.2 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 1920 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2066.5 mm |
8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 630 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1436 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1499.6 mm |