- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Caterpillar 299C vs. Bobcat T770
Caterpillar 299C vs. Bobcat T770
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 299C:
Sizes
Machine rear swing radius from center | 1775 mm and 2235.2 mm | 21 % less or 460.2 mm |
Load-transfer device
Tipping load | 3782.1 kg and 4503.7 kg | 16 % less or 721.6 kg |
Hydraulic system
Pump flow rate | 84 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 4 % less or 3.1 l/min |
6 reasons to buy Bobcat T770:
Sizes
Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm and 763 mm | 14 % more or 120.9 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 103 l. and 98 l. | 5 % more or 5 l. |
Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 8.1 km/h | 24 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Maximum speed at high range | 17.2 km/h and 13.6 km/h | 21 % more or 3.6 km/h |
Motor
Effective power | 68.6 kW and 67.1 kW | 2 % more or 1.5 kW |
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 29 kPa and 29.6 kPa | 2 % less or 0.6 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 2117 mm and 2072.6 mm |
Length without bucket | 3101 mm and 2895.6 mm |
Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm and 2011.7 mm |
Length with bucket | 3820 mm and 3596.6 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 4867 kg and 4684.2 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
Workload | 1882.4 kg and 1576.2 kg |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 22994 kPa and 24131.6 kPa |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1767 mm and 1645.9 mm |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 2117 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm |
6. Length without bucket | 3101 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 2895.6 mm |
8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 763 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm |
1. Length with bucket | 3820 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm |
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1981 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1767 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1645.9 mm |