- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Gehl CTL70 vs. Bobcat T650
Gehl CTL70 vs. Bobcat T650
6 reasons to buy Gehl CTL70:
Sizes
| Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 874 mm and 868.7 mm | 1 % more or 5.3 mm |
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 15.1 l. and 11.4 l. | 25 % more or 3.7 l. |
Load-transfer device
| Tipping load | 2699.8 kg and 3330.7 kg | 19 % less or 630.9 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump flow rate | 75 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 14 % less or 12.1 l/min |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track width | 457 mm and 320 mm | 30 % more or 137 mm |
| Specific ground pressure | 28.3 kPa and 40 kPa | 29 % less or 11.7 kPa |
2 reasons to buy Bobcat T650:
Operation
| Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 7.2 km/h | 32 % more or 3.4 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 103.3 l. and 90.1 l. | 13 % more or 13.2 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 1770 mm and 1853.2 mm |
| Length with bucket | 3708 mm and 3474.7 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2167 mm and 2066.5 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4350 kg and 4281.9 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
| Workload | 1349.9 kg and 1664.7 kg |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1496 mm and 1499.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 874 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 868.7 mm |
| 1. Length with bucket | 3708 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3474.7 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1770 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1853.2 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2167 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2066.5 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1496 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1499.6 mm |