- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rough Terrain Truck/
- Volvo MCT135C vs. Bobcat T770
Volvo MCT135C vs. Bobcat T770
5 reasons to buy Volvo MCT135C:
Sizes
Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 900 mm and 883.9 mm | 2 % more or 16.1 mm |
Machine rear swing radius from center | 1760 mm and 2235.2 mm | 21 % less or 475.2 mm |
Load-transfer device
Tipping load | 3913.6 kg and 4503.7 kg | 13 % less or 590.1 kg |
Hydraulic system
Pump flow rate | 87 l/min and 87.1 l/min | 0 % less or 0.1 l/min |
Carrier
Caterpillar track width | 450 mm and 449.6 mm | 0 % more or 0.4 mm |
2 reasons to buy Bobcat T770:
Operation
Maximum speed at low range | 10.6 km/h and 9.2 km/h | 13 % more or 1.4 km/h |
Maximum speed at high range | 17.2 km/h and 12.6 km/h | 27 % more or 4.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Width between caterpillar tracks | 1980 mm and 2011.7 mm |
Length with bucket | 3780 mm and 3596.6 mm |
Length without bucket | 2740 mm and 2895.6 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2080 mm and 2072.6 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 4836.7 kg and 4684.2 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 103 l. and 103 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 68.6 kW and 68.6 kW |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Load-transfer device
Workload | 1360.8 kg and 1576.2 kg |
Shovel width | 1981.2 mm and 2032 mm |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 22994 kPa and 24131.6 kPa |
Images
Sizes
8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 900 mm | 8. Radius at maximum lifting and unloading | 883.9 mm |
1. Length with bucket | 3780 mm | 1. Length with bucket | 3596.6 mm |
2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1980 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2011.7 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2080 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2072.6 mm |
6. Length without bucket | 2740 mm | 6. Length without bucket | 2895.6 mm |