- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Dump Truck/
- Komatsu HD465-2 vs. Caterpillar 69D ejector
Komatsu HD465-2 vs. Caterpillar 69D ejector
4 reasons to buy Komatsu HD465-2:
Weight
| Loaded front weight distribution | 32 % and 31 % | 3 % more or 1 % |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 780 l. and 530 l. | 32 % more or 250 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 506.3 kW and 380.3 kW | 25 % more or 126.0 kW |
Dump
| Lifting capacity with top | 34.2 m3 and 18.2 m3 | 47 % more or 16.0 m3 |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 69D ejector:
Weight
| Loaded rear weight distribution | 69 % and 68 % | 1 % more or 1 % |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 76.6 km/h and 65 km/h | 15 % more or 11.6 km/h |
| Forward gears number | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Weight without load | 36500 kg and 35607 kg |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 9000 mm and 7830 mm |
| Overall width | 4050 mm and 3665 mm |
| Headroom | 4250 mm and 3442 mm |
Operation
| Tyre size | 21.00-35-32PR and 18x33 2 ** Radial |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | VTA-1710-C and 3408E HEUI |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 49895.2 kg and 36287.4 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 9000 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 7830 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 4050 mm | 2. Overall width | 3665 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 4250 mm | 3. Headroom | 3442 mm |