- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mining Excavator/
- Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH400
Komatsu PC8000 vs. Terex RH400
4 reasons to buy Komatsu PC8000:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 11500 l. and 10000 l. | 13 % more or 1500 l. |
Carrier
Upper rollers number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
Lower rollers number | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm and 2000 mm | 63 % more or 3340 mm |
6 reasons to buy Terex RH400:
Shovel
Bucket initial volume | 45 m3 and 38 m3 | 16 % more or 7 m3 |
Operation
Generator current strength | 350 amperes and 100 amperes | 71 % more or 250 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 16000 l. and 14000 l. | 12 % more or 2000 l. |
Rotation speed | 4.4 rev / min and 3.5 rev / min | 20 % more or 0.9 rev |
Motor
Effective power | 3355.6 kW and 3000 kW | 11 % more or 355.6 kW |
Loading bucket
Maximum digging radius | 19000 mm and 16100 mm | 15 % more or 2900 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | 2 x SDA16V160 and 2 x QSK 60-C |
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Cummins |
Aspiration | turbocharging and cooling at the outlet and turbocharging and cooling at the outlet |
Cylinders number | 16 and 16 |
Loading bucket
Loading bucket | Boom 29'10" (9100mm) / Section 11'2" (3400mm) and boom 31'2" (9500mm) Section 18'4" (5600mm) |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 2.2 km/h and 2.2 km/h |
Track shoes number on either side | 48 and 48 |
Images
Loading bucket
19. Maximum digging radius | 16100 mm | 19. Maximum digging radius | 19000 mm |
Carrier
14. Bucket loader support width | 5340 mm | 14. Bucket loader support width | 2000 mm |