- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar 345C Mh vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
Caterpillar 345C Mh vs. Komatsu PC600LC-7
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar 345C Mh:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 5722.1 kg and 65323 kg | 91 % less or 59600.9 kg |
5 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-7:
Motor
Effective power | 287 kW and 257.3 kW | 10 % more or 29.7 kW |
Boom features 2
Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm and 18000 mm | 3 % more or 592.8 mm |
Maximum height | 19507.2 mm and 18000 mm | 8 % more or 1507.2 mm |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 16764 mm and 16500 mm | 2 % more or 264 mm |
Maximum height | 17983.2 mm and 16900 mm | 6 % more or 1083.2 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
Shoe dimensions | 750 mm and 750 mm |
Track width | 3720 mm and 4064 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Komatsu |
Model | C13 ACERT and SA6D140E-3 |
Hydraulic system
Type of pump | twin variable displacement piston pumps and variable displacement piston pump |
Boom features 2
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | Machine equipped with 18.0 m (59'11) front traction and 2-piece front 18.3 m 60' |
Boom features 1
Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | Machine equipped with 16.5 m (54'2'') front traction and 2-piece front 16.7 m 55' |
Images
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 18000 mm | 9. Maximum height | 19507.2 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18000 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 18592.8 mm |