vs.

      Caterpillar 385C MH vs. Komatsu PC600LC-8

      7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385C MH:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 995 l. and 360 l. 64 % more or 635 l.
      Engine oil volume 65 l. and 40 l. 38 % more or 25 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 382.5 kW and 320 kW 16 % more or 62.5 kW
      Displacement 18.1 l. and 15.2 l. 16 % more or 2.9 l.

      Hydraulic system

      Pump bandwidth 980 l/min and 820 l/min 16 % more or 160 l/min

      Boom features 1

      Maximum radius along ground level 21800 mm and 16800 mm 23 % more or 5000 mm
      Maximum height 22600 mm and 18500 mm 18 % more or 4100 mm

      7 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600LC-8:

      Tracked undercarriage

      Track shoes number per side 52 and 51 2 % more or 1

      Swing device

      Swing torque 209448.1 Nm and 204499.4 Nm 2 % more or 4948.7 Nm
      Rotation speed 8.3 rev / min and 6.5 rev / min 22 % more or 1.8 rev

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 67399 kg and 92616 kg 27 % less or 25217 kg
      Cooling system fluid volume 58 l. and 10 l. 83 % more or 48 l.

      Boom features 2

      Maximum radius along ground level 18300 mm and 17200 mm 6 % more or 1100 mm
      Maximum height 18600 mm and 16260 mm 13 % more or 2340 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Tracked undercarriage

      Rolling bearings number on either side 9 and 9
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 5131 mm and 4600 mm
      Track width 1231087.2 mm and 2590 mm

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Komatsu
      Model C18 ACERT and SAA6D140E-5

      Hydraulic system

      Discharge pressure 35025.3 kPa and 34335.9 kPa

      Images

      Boom features 1

      9. Maximum height 16260 mm 9. Maximum height 18600 mm
      10. Maximum radius along ground level 17200 mm 10. Maximum radius along ground level 18300 mm