- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Caterpillar 385C MH vs. Liebherr A924CHD
Caterpillar 385C MH vs. Liebherr A924CHD
11 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385C MH:
Swing device
Swing torque | 204499.4 Nm and 74 Nm | 100 % more or 204425.4 Nm |
Sizes
Upper structure clearance | 1699 mm and 1410 mm | 17 % more or 289 mm |
Clearance | 850 mm and 255 mm | 70 % more or 595 mm |
Load-transfer height | 4023 mm and 3330 mm | 17 % more or 693 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 995 l. and 430 l. | 57 % more or 565 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 7 l. | 61 % more or 11.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 980 l/min and 215 l/min | 78 % more or 765 l/min |
Boom features 2
Maximum radius along ground level | 17200 mm and 12500 mm | 27 % more or 4700 mm |
Maximum height | 16260 mm and 14000 mm | 14 % more or 2260 mm |
Boom features 1
Maximum radius along ground level | 21800 mm and 11500 mm | 47 % more or 10300 mm |
Maximum height | 22600 mm and 13000 mm | 42 % more or 9600 mm |
2 reasons to buy Liebherr A924CHD:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 8 rev / min and 6.5 rev / min | 19 % more or 1.5 rev |
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 31547.3 kg and 92616 kg | 66 % less or 61068.7 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Undercarriage width | 4801 mm and 2990 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Liebherr |
Model | C18 ACERT and D 934 L |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 850 mm | 5. Clearance | 255 mm |
12. Upper structure clearance | 1699 mm | 12. Upper structure clearance | 1410 mm |
2. Undercarriage width | 4801 mm | 2. Undercarriage width | 2990 mm |
3. Load-transfer height | 4023 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3330 mm |
Boom features 1
9. Maximum height | 16260 mm | 9. Maximum height | 11000 mm |
10. Maximum radius along ground level | 17200 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 12700 mm |