- Home/
- Comparison/
- Handler/
- Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 330D MH
Komatsu PC300HD-7 vs. Caterpillar 330D MH
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC300HD-7:
Boom features 2
| Maximum depth | 5334 mm and -7060 mm | 232 % more or 12394 mm |
Boom features 1
| Maximum height | 16002 mm and 15800 mm | 1 % more or 202 mm |
| Maximum depth | 5181.6 mm and -5560 mm | 207 % more or 10741.6 mm |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D MH:
Tracked undercarriage
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 7 | 22 % more or 2 |
Motor
| Effective power | 199.8 kW and 180.5 kW | 10 % more or 19.3 kW |
Boom features 2
| Maximum radius along ground level | 16000 mm and 13716 mm | 14 % more or 2284 mm |
| Maximum height | 16900 mm and 14478 mm | 14 % more or 2422 mm |
Boom features 1
| Maximum radius along ground level | 14600 mm and 14478 mm | 1 % more or 122 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Tracked undercarriage
| Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 600 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SAA6D114E-2 and C9 ACERT |
Boom features 2
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 2 | 3-piece front 14.0 m 46' and Long boom |
Boom features 1
| Option - Boom/Section (MAT) 1 | 2-piece front 14.6 m 48' and Short handle |
Images
Boom features 1
| 9. Maximum height | 14478 mm | 9. Maximum height | 16900 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 13716 mm | 10. Maximum radius along ground level | 16000 mm |
| 11. Maximum depth | 5334 mm | 11. Maximum depth | -7060 mm |