- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX870C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX870C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 190 l. | 49 % more or 180 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 970 l. | 18 % more or 211 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX870C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Operational weight without attachment | 34926.6 kg and 35680 kg | 2 % less or 753.4 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3327 mm and 3330 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3710 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9400 kg and 7850 kg |
Alignment device
Front end | 20 degrees and 20 degrees |
Lateral part | 11 degrees and 15 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |