vs.

      John Deere 853J vs. Tigercat 860C

      5 reasons to buy John Deere 853J:

      Sizes

      Clearance 739 mm and 710 mm 4 % more or 29 mm

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 26675.8 kg and 27330 kg 2 % less or 654.2 kg
      Fuel Capacity 1116.7 l. and 970 l. 13 % more or 146.7 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 310.4 l. and 190 l. 39 % more or 120.4 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 80 amperes 27 % more or 30 amperes

      Motor

      Full power 223.7 kW and 219 kW 2 % more or 4.7 kW

      Carrier

      Traction force 27215.5 kg and 25265.1 kg 7 % more or 1950.4 kg

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm and 8400 mm 1 % more or 60 mm
      Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm and 5000 mm 4 % less or 200 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Overall width 3170 mm and 3275 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3780 mm and 3300 mm
      Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm and 1445 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Manufacturer John Deere and Cummins
      Model 6081H and QSL9

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 203.2 mm and 200 mm
      Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm and 610 mm
      Rolling bearings number on either side 8 and 8

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 6431.9 kg and 6040 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      5. Clearance 739 mm 5. Clearance 710 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 1445 mm
      2. Overall width 3170 mm 2. Overall width 3275 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3780 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3300 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 5000 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8400 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm