- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 903J vs. Tigercat LX822C
John Deere 903J vs. Tigercat LX822C
6 reasons to buy John Deere 903J:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 28730.5 kg and 32660 kg | 12 % less or 3929.5 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 626.7 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 146 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 29937.1 kg | 11 % more or 3764.8 kg |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm and 8380 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
Clearance | 760 mm and 749 mm | 1 % more or 11 mm |
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5000 mm | 35 % less or 1750 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3170 mm and 3275 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 710 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6430 kg and 4581.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3170 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
5. Clearance | 749 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 5000 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm |