vs.

      John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 860C

      6 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:

      Sizes

      Clearance 770 mm and 710 mm 8 % more or 60 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1116.7 l. and 970 l. 13 % more or 146.7 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 310.4 l. and 190 l. 39 % more or 120.4 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Carrier

      Traction force 33701.9 kg and 27215.5 kg 19 % more or 6486.4 kg
      Rolling bearings number on either side 10 and 8 20 % more or 2

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 27330 kg and 34427.7 kg 21 % less or 7097.7 kg
      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 80 amperes 27 % more or 30 amperes

      Motor

      Full power 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW 2 % more or 4.5 kW

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm and 8360 mm 1 % more or 100 mm
      Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm and 5030 mm 5 % less or 230 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm and 1445 mm
      Overall width 3330 mm and 3275 mm
      Height to cab upper part 4000 mm and 3300 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Manufacturer John Deere and Cummins
      Model 6081H and QSL9

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 216 mm and 200 mm
      Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm and 610 mm

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 6432 kg and 6040 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3330 mm 2. Overall width 3275 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 4000 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3300 mm
      5. Clearance 770 mm 5. Clearance 710 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 1445 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 5030 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8360 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm