- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 860C
John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 860C
6 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 710 mm | 8 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 146.7 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 120.4 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 27215.5 kg | 19 % more or 6486.4 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 34427.7 kg | 21 % less or 7097.7 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8360 mm | 1 % more or 100 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 5030 mm | 5 % less or 230 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm and 1445 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3275 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6432 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 5030 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |