- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill 2250B vs. Tigercat L870C
Madill 2250B vs. Tigercat L870C
4 reasons to buy Madill 2250B:
Sizes
| Clearance | 737.6 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 27.6 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 33112.2 kg | 18 % more or 7257.5 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat L870C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm and 1420 mm |
| Overall width | 3200.4 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm and 3710 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 610 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 9 |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9888.3 kg and 6032.8 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |