- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 822C vs. Caterpillar 532
Tigercat 822C vs. Caterpillar 532
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 24494 kg and 31450 kg | 22 % less or 6956 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 760 mm | 15 % more or 129 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 38555 kg and 25401.2 kg | 34 % more or 13153.8 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4445 mm and 8611 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3200 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3962 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215.9 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4025 kg and 7100 kg |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 4445 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8611 mm |
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |